Compare commits

...
Author SHA1 Message Date
9qeklajc 0c7373675f solidify logic 2026-06-27 22:53:35 +02:00
9qeklajc a33ea5da07 update-pricing 2026-06-27 16:01:45 +02:00
3 changed files with 156 additions and 14 deletions
+38 -5
View File
@@ -94,7 +94,10 @@ def backfill_cache_pricing(model_id: str, pricing: Pricing) -> Pricing:
cache reads (DeepSeek hits are 10x cheaper) and undercharges Anthropic
cache writes (1.25x). litellm ships per-model USD rates keyed by the exact
OpenRouter id (deepseek/deepseek-chat) or by the bare model name
(gpt-4o, claude-sonnet-4-5), so both spellings are tried.
(gpt-4o, claude-sonnet-4-5), so both spellings are tried. litellm keys are
lowercase, but a generic upstream may report a mixed-case id
(``deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Flash``); an exact match is attempted first, then
a case-insensitive fallback so such ids still resolve.
Rates already present (e.g. provided by OpenRouter) are authoritative and
never overwritten. Unknown models are returned unchanged.
@@ -106,12 +109,26 @@ def backfill_cache_pricing(model_id: str, pricing: Pricing) -> Pricing:
import litellm
candidates = (model_id, model_id.split("/", 1)[-1])
info: dict | None = None
for key in (model_id, model_id.split("/", 1)[-1]):
for key in candidates:
candidate = litellm.model_cost.get(key)
if isinstance(candidate, dict):
info = candidate
break
if info is None:
# Case-insensitive fallback: a mixed-case upstream id (e.g.
# ``deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Flash``) won't match litellm's lowercase
# keys exactly. Build a lowercased index once and retry.
lowered = {c.lower() for c in candidates}
for key, candidate in litellm.model_cost.items():
if (
isinstance(key, str)
and key.lower() in lowered
and isinstance(candidate, dict)
):
info = candidate
break
if info is None:
return pricing
@@ -215,13 +232,29 @@ def _row_to_model(
)
top_provider_dict = json.loads(row.top_provider) if row.top_provider else None
if apply_provider_fee and isinstance(pricing, dict):
pricing = {k: float(v) * provider_fee for k, v in pricing.items()}
if isinstance(pricing, dict) and float(pricing.get("request", 0.0)) <= 0.0:
pricing["request"] = max(pricing.get("request", 0.0), 0.0)
parsed_pricing = Pricing.parse_obj(pricing)
# Fill missing cache-read/write rates from litellm's cost map BEFORE applying
# the provider fee, so they carry the same markup as every other component.
# DB-stored override pricing (e.g. generic providers) omits cache rates;
# without this, ``_row_to_model`` bills cache reads at the full input rate —
# the ``_apply_provider_fee_to_model`` path backfills, but the override path
# used for admin-configured providers did not.
#
# Key on ``forwarded_model_id`` (the actual upstream model name litellm
# prices) when set: an alias row (id="local-alias",
# forwarded_model_id="deepseek-v4-flash") would otherwise look up the alias
# and miss the cache rate.
pricing_model_id = getattr(row, "forwarded_model_id", None) or row.id
parsed_pricing = backfill_cache_pricing(pricing_model_id, parsed_pricing)
if apply_provider_fee:
parsed_pricing = Pricing.parse_obj(
{k: float(v) * provider_fee for k, v in parsed_pricing.dict().items()}
)
model = Model(
id=row.id,
name=row.name,
+16 -9
View File
@@ -3,10 +3,15 @@
litellm's bundled cost map does not yet ship ``deepseek-v4-flash`` /
``deepseek-v4-pro``. Without an entry, ``backfill_cache_pricing`` cannot find a
``cache_read_input_token_cost`` and cache reads fall back to the full input
rate — a ~60% overcharge on cache hits (DeepSeek hits are ~0.2x input).
rate — a large overcharge on cache hits (DeepSeek V4 hits are ~0.008-0.02x
input, i.e. cached tokens cost 50-120x less than regular input).
This module injects the missing entries into ``litellm.model_cost`` at startup
so the existing backfill path resolves them. Rates mirror the open upstream PR
so the existing backfill path resolves them. Rates mirror the canonical
``deepseek`` provider entries now in litellm's ``model_prices`` map
(``input_cost_per_token`` is the cache-*miss* rate;
``cache_read_input_token_cost`` is the cache-*hit* rate), sourced from
https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing via
https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm/pull/26380 (issue
https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm/issues/30430).
@@ -22,21 +27,23 @@ from ..core import get_logger
logger = get_logger(__name__)
# USD per token. Source: BerriAI/litellm PR #26380.
# USD per token. Mirrors the canonical ``deepseek`` provider entries in
# litellm's model_prices map (source: DeepSeek API pricing docs). Keep these in
# sync with ``litellm.model_cost["deepseek/deepseek-v4-*"]``.
_DEEPSEEK_V4_RATES: dict[str, dict[str, float]] = {
"deepseek-v4-flash": {
"input_cost_per_token": 1.4e-07,
"output_cost_per_token": 2.8e-07,
"cache_read_input_token_cost": 2.8e-08,
"cache_read_input_token_cost": 2.8e-09,
"cache_creation_input_token_cost": 0.0,
"input_cost_per_token_cache_hit": 2.8e-08,
"input_cost_per_token_cache_hit": 2.8e-09,
},
"deepseek-v4-pro": {
"input_cost_per_token": 1.74e-06,
"output_cost_per_token": 3.48e-06,
"cache_read_input_token_cost": 1.4e-07,
"input_cost_per_token": 4.35e-07,
"output_cost_per_token": 8.7e-07,
"cache_read_input_token_cost": 3.625e-09,
"cache_creation_input_token_cost": 0.0,
"input_cost_per_token_cache_hit": 1.4e-07,
"input_cost_per_token_cache_hit": 3.625e-09,
},
}
+102
View File
@@ -81,6 +81,21 @@ def test_backfill_strips_vendor_prefix_for_litellm_lookup() -> None:
assert result.input_cache_read == expected
def test_backfill_case_insensitive_lookup() -> None:
"""A generic upstream may report a mixed-case id
(deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Flash); litellm keys are lowercase. The
case-insensitive fallback still resolves the cache rate."""
pricing = Pricing(prompt=1.4e-07, completion=2.8e-07)
result = backfill_cache_pricing("deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Flash", pricing)
expected = litellm.model_cost["deepseek-v4-flash"][
"cache_read_input_token_cost"
]
assert result.input_cache_read == expected
assert result.input_cache_read < pricing.prompt # sanity: it's a discount
def test_backfill_fills_cache_write_rate() -> None:
"""Anthropic cache writes cost more than input (1.25x); billing them at
the input rate undercharges. litellm carries the write rate."""
@@ -136,6 +151,93 @@ def test_provider_fee_applies_to_backfilled_cache_rates() -> None:
assert adjusted.pricing.prompt == pytest.approx(2.8e-07 * 2.0)
def test_row_to_model_backfills_cache_rate() -> None:
"""The DB-override path (admin-configured providers, e.g. a generic
upstream) stores pricing without cache rates. ``_row_to_model`` must
backfill them from litellm just like ``_apply_provider_fee_to_model``,
otherwise cache reads bill at the full input rate."""
import json
from routstr.core.db import ModelRow
from routstr.payment.models import _row_to_model
row = ModelRow(
id="deepseek-v4-flash",
name="deepseek-v4-flash",
created=0,
description="",
context_length=1000000,
architecture=json.dumps(
{
"modality": "text",
"input_modalities": ["text"],
"output_modalities": ["text"],
"tokenizer": "unknown",
"instruct_type": None,
}
),
# Stored pricing omits input_cache_read (generic provider never sets it).
pricing=json.dumps({"prompt": 1.4e-07, "completion": 2.8e-07}),
enabled=True,
upstream_provider_id=1,
)
with patch(
"routstr.payment.models.sats_usd_price", return_value=5.0e-5
):
model = _row_to_model(row, apply_provider_fee=True, provider_fee=1.0)
litellm_read = litellm.model_cost["deepseek-v4-flash"][
"cache_read_input_token_cost"
]
assert model.pricing.input_cache_read == pytest.approx(litellm_read)
assert model.pricing.input_cache_read < model.pricing.prompt # a discount
assert model.sats_pricing is not None
assert model.sats_pricing.input_cache_read > 0
def test_row_to_model_backfills_via_forwarded_model_id() -> None:
"""An alias row (id != forwarded_model_id) must backfill cache rates from
the *forwarded* model name — the real upstream model litellm prices —
not the alias id, which litellm doesn't know."""
import json
from routstr.core.db import ModelRow
from routstr.payment.models import _row_to_model
row = ModelRow(
id="local-alias", # litellm has no such key
name="local-alias",
created=0,
description="",
context_length=1000000,
architecture=json.dumps(
{
"modality": "text",
"input_modalities": ["text"],
"output_modalities": ["text"],
"tokenizer": "unknown",
"instruct_type": None,
}
),
pricing=json.dumps({"prompt": 1.4e-07, "completion": 2.8e-07}),
enabled=True,
upstream_provider_id=1,
forwarded_model_id="deepseek-v4-flash",
)
with patch(
"routstr.payment.models.sats_usd_price", return_value=5.0e-5
):
model = _row_to_model(row, apply_provider_fee=True, provider_fee=1.0)
litellm_read = litellm.model_cost["deepseek-v4-flash"][
"cache_read_input_token_cost"
]
assert model.pricing.input_cache_read == pytest.approx(litellm_read)
assert model.pricing.input_cache_read < model.pricing.prompt
# ============================================================================
# calculate_cost — cached tokens billed at cache rates
# ============================================================================