Fix proof selection algo performance

__tests__/exactMatchSelection.test.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
+/**
+ * Exact-match proof selection (`CashuUtils.findExactMatch` / `getProofsToSend`).
+ *
+ * Regression coverage for a transfer that stalled ~50s on the JS thread and got
+ * the app killed by the iOS watchdog for memory: the former backtracker searched
+ * exhaustively when no exact match existed. Pins that the greedy replacement finds
+ * an exact match whenever one exists, and stays fast when none does.
+ *
+ * @jest-environment node
+ */
+
+jest.mock('../src/services/logService', () => ({
+  log: {debug: jest.fn(), error: jest.fn(), info: jest.fn(), trace: jest.fn(), warn: jest.fn()},
+}))
+
+jest.mock('../src/services/nostrService', () => ({
+  NostrClient: {getFirstTagValue: jest.fn()},
+}))
+
+import {CashuUtils} from '../src/services/cashu/cashuUtils'
+import {Proof} from '../src/models/Proof'
+
+let secretSeq = 0
+const mkProof = (amount: number): Proof =>
+  ({id: '00aaaaaaaaaaaaaa', amount, secret: `secret-${secretSeq++}`, C: 'C', unit: 'sat'} as unknown as Proof)
+
+const sum = (ps: Proof[]) => ps.reduce((s, p) => s + p.amount, 0)
+
+// Seeded so a failure is reproducible.
+let seed = 42
+const rnd = () => (seed = (seed * 1103515245 + 12345) % 2 ** 31) / 2 ** 31
+
+/** A wallet as mints issue it: each receipt split into powers of two, small change optionally thinned out. */
+const mkWallet = (receipts: number, maxAmount: number, thinBelow = 0): Proof[] => {
+  const proofs: Proof[] = []
+  for (let r = 0; r < receipts; r++) {
+    const amount = 1 + Math.floor(rnd() * maxAmount)
+    for (let b = 0; b < 21; b++) {
+      const denom = 1 << b
+      if (amount & denom && !(denom < thinBelow && rnd() < 0.85)) proofs.push(mkProof(denom))
+    }
+  }
+  return proofs
+}
+
+/** Ground truth: can any subset sum exactly to target? */
+const reachable = (proofs: Proof[], target: number) => {
+  const dp = new Uint8Array(target + 1)
+  dp[0] = 1
+  for (const p of proofs) for (let s = target; s >= p.amount; s--) if (dp[s - p.amount]) dp[s] = 1
+  return dp[target] === 1
+}
+
+describe('findExactMatch', () => {
+  test.each([
+    ['plenty of change', 60, 20000, 0],
+    ['sparse wallet', 5, 100000, 0],
+    ['little small change', 40, 20000, 64],
+  ])('finds an exact match whenever one exists — %s', (_, receipts, maxAmount, thinBelow) => {
+    for (let i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
+      const wallet = mkWallet(receipts, maxAmount, thinBelow)
+      // Half the targets are a real subset sum, half arbitrary.
+      const target = rnd() < 0.5
+        ? sum(wallet.filter(() => rnd() < 0.3)) || 1
+        : 1 + Math.floor(rnd() * sum(wallet))
+
+      const match = CashuUtils.findExactMatch(target, wallet)
+
+      expect(match !== null).toBe(reachable(wallet, target))
+      if (match) expect(sum(match)).toBe(target)
+    }
+  })
+
+  test('does not reorder the caller\'s array', () => {
+    const wallet = [1, 8, 2, 4].map(mkProof)
+    const before = wallet.map(p => p.secret)
+    CashuUtils.findExactMatch(5, wallet)
+    expect(wallet.map(p => p.secret)).toEqual(before)
+  })
+
+  test('returns fast on a large wallet with no exact match', () => {
+    // 1000 proofs, no denomination below 2: an odd target is unreachable. The
+    // former backtracker took ~60s and ~700MB on this in desktop Node.
+    const wallet = Array.from({length: 1000}, (_, i) => mkProof(2 ** (1 + (i % 16))))
+
+    const start = Date.now()
+    expect(CashuUtils.findExactMatch(187415, wallet)).toBeNull()
+    const selected = CashuUtils.getProofsToSend(187415, wallet)
+    expect(Date.now() - start).toBeLessThan(200)
+
+    expect(sum(selected)).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(187415)
+  })
+})

src/services/cashu/cashuUtils.ts

@@ -167,44 +167,27 @@ const getMintsFromToken = function (token: Token): string[] {
 }
 
 
+/*
+ * Largest-first greedy: take every proof that still fits. Exact for Cashu's
+ * power-of-two amounts — each amount divides every larger one, so if any subset
+ * sums to the target, this finds one. (It is also the first path the former
+ * backtracker explored; the rest of that search could never succeed and, on a
+ * large wallet with no exact match, ran for tens of seconds and exhausted memory.)
+ * With non-power-of-two amounts it may miss a match and return null, which only
+ * costs a swap via the findMinExcess fallback.
+ */
 const findExactMatch = function (requestedAmount: number, proofs: Proof[]): Proof[] | null {
-  const result: Proof[] = [];
-  const memo = new Set<string>(); // A set to store visited states
-  const MAX_DEPTH = 1000;  // Set a reasonable recursion depth limit
+  const result: Proof[] = []
+  let remaining = requestedAmount
 
-  function backtrack(start: number, remaining: number, depth: number): boolean {
-      if (depth > MAX_DEPTH) {
-        log.error('[findExactMatch] Hit max algo depth')
-        return false;  // Stop recursion if the depth limit is reached
-      }
-
-      if (remaining === 0) {
-          return true;
-      }
-
-      if (memo.has(`${start}-${remaining}`)) { // Check if we've already visited this state
-        log.trace('[findExactMatch] Same state cycle detected')
-        return false;
-      }
-
-      memo.add(`${start}-${remaining}`); // Mark the state as visited
-
-      for (let i = start; i < proofs.length; i++) {
-          if (proofs[i].amount > remaining) continue;
-          result.push(proofs[i]);
-          if (backtrack(i + 1, remaining - proofs[i].amount, depth + 1)) {
-              return true;
-          }
-          result.pop();
-      }
-      return false;
+  for (const proof of [...proofs].sort((a, b) => b.amount - a.amount)) {
+      if (remaining === 0) break
+      if (proof.amount > remaining) continue
+      result.push(proof)
+      remaining -= proof.amount
   }
 
-  proofs.sort((a, b) => b.amount - a.amount);
-  if (backtrack(0, requestedAmount, 0)) {
-      return result;
-  }
-  return null;
+  return remaining === 0 ? result : null
 }
 
 const findMinExcess = function (requestedAmount: number, proofs: Proof[], preference: 'SMALL' | 'BIG' = 'SMALL'): Proof[] {