128-bit truncated SHA-256 provides adequate collision resistance (2^64 birthday bound, 2^128 pre-image) while cutting per-packet header overhead nearly in half, aligning with Yggdrasil's approach and IPv6 address size. Code changes: - NodeAddr inner type [u8; 32] → [u8; 16], from_pubkey takes first 16 bytes - DATA_HEADER_SIZE 68 → 36, signing_bytes capacity 80 → 48 - proof_bytes capacity 40 → 24 - Updated all make_node_addr test helpers and size assertion tests Doc changes: - All wire format tables and offset calculations updated - AncestryEntry size 112 → 96 bytes - Packet size examples recalculated throughout
22 KiB
FIPS Routing Design
This document describes the routing architecture for FIPS, including Bloom filter reachability, discovery protocol, greedy tree routing, and routing session establishment.
For wire formats and exchange rules, see fips-gossip-protocol.md. For spanning tree dynamics and convergence, see spanning-tree-dynamics.md.
Overview
FIPS routing combines three mechanisms:
- Bloom filters: Fast reachability lookup for nearby destinations (within K-hop scope)
- Discovery protocol: Query-based lookup for distant destinations
- Greedy tree routing: Coordinate-based forwarding using spanning tree position
The design separates discovery (finding where a destination is) from routing (getting packets there). Bloom filters and discovery handle the former; tree coordinates handle the latter.
Design Goals
- Minimize per-packet overhead for data transfer
- Bounded state at each node (independent of network size)
- Efficient routing without global knowledge
- Graceful degradation for constrained devices
- Fast convergence on topology changes
Network Scale Assumptions
| Scale | Nodes | Bloom Filter Role |
|---|---|---|
| Small private network | 100-1,000 | Covers entire network |
| Modest public network | ~1,000,000 | Covers K-hop neighborhood |
| Internet-scale | Billions | Out of scope (requires different architecture) |
The primary design target is networks up to ~1M nodes.
Node Participation Modes
Full Participant
- Maintains Bloom filters for peer reachability
- Participates in spanning tree (can be selected as parent)
- Routes packets for other nodes
- Minimum viable device: ESP32-class (~500KB RAM)
Leaf-Only
- Single peer handles all routing on its behalf
- No Bloom filter storage or processing
- Does not participate in spanning tree as potential parent
- Suitable for highly constrained devices (sensors, battery-powered nodes)
Leaf-only nodes appear as a single entry in their peer's Bloom filter. All traffic tunnels through that peer.
Part 1: Bloom Filter Design
Parameters
| Parameter | Value | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Filter size | 1 KB (8,192 bits) | Sized for expected occupancy with margin |
| Hash functions | 5 | Optimal for 800-1,600 entries at this size |
| Scope (K) | 2 | Effective ~4-hop reach with TTL propagation |
Mathematical Foundation
False Positive Rate (FPR):
FPR = (1 - e^(-kn/m))^k
Where m = bits, n = entries, k = hash functions.
Optimal hash count:
k_opt = (m/n) × ln(2) ≈ 0.693 × (m/n)
For m=8,192 and expected n=800: k_opt ≈ 7. We use k=5 to accommodate higher occupancy scenarios (up to ~1,600 entries) while maintaining acceptable FPR.
Required bits for target FPR:
m = -1.44 × n × ln(p)
For 1% FPR: m ≈ 9.6n bits. For 5% FPR: m ≈ 6.2n bits.
Expected Filter Occupancy
Filter occupancy depends on K-hop scope and node degree, not total network size. The TTL mechanism bounds entries regardless of network scale.
Nodes within h hops in a tree (branching factor b = d-1):
nodes_within_h_hops = (b^(h+1) - 1) / (b - 1)
For d=8 (b=7), K=2: each peer's 2-hop neighborhood ≈ 57 nodes.
Outgoing filter to peer Q contains:
- Self (1 entry)
- Entries from (d-1) other peers' filters, with overlap
Expected occupancy by node degree:
| Degree (d) | Expected Entries | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 100-200 | Constrained/IoT |
| 8 | 250-400 | Typical node |
| 12 | 500-800 | Well-connected |
| 20+ | 1,200-1,800 | Hub node |
False Positive Rates (1 KB filter, k=5)
| Entries | FPR | Scenario |
|---|---|---|
| 200 | 0.02% | Low-degree node |
| 400 | 0.3% | Typical node |
| 800 | 2.4% | Well-connected |
| 1,200 | 7.5% | Hub node |
| 1,600 | 15% | Heavily loaded hub |
FPR above 5% triggers more LookupRequests but the discovery protocol handles this gracefully. Hub nodes may benefit from larger filters in future protocol versions (see §1.6).
Size Classes (Forward Compatibility)
Filter sizes are powers of 2 to enable folding — a technique for shrinking filters by ORing halves:
fn fold(filter: &[u8]) -> Vec<u8> {
let half = filter.len() / 2;
(0..half).map(|i| filter[i] | filter[i + half]).collect()
}
Folding preserves correctness (no false negatives) but increases FPR.
| size_class | Bits | Bytes | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 4,096 | 512 | Reserved (future) |
| 1 | 8,192 | 1,024 | Current default |
| 2 | 16,384 | 2,048 | Reserved (future) |
| 3 | 32,768 | 4,096 | Reserved (future) |
v1 protocol: All nodes MUST use size_class=1. The field is present in the wire format for forward compatibility.
Future versions: Nodes may negotiate larger filters. Receivers fold down to their preferred size if sender's filter is larger. This allows hub nodes to maintain higher precision while constrained nodes use smaller filters.
Filter Contents
Each node's filter contains Node IDs (and optionally gateway /64 prefixes) that are reachable through that node. A Node ID is the SHA-256 hash of the node's npub, truncated or used directly as the filter key.
Per-Peer Filters
Each node maintains a Bloom filter for each peer direction:
peer_filters: HashMap<NodeAddr, BloomFilter>
The filter for peer P answers: "Which destinations are reachable through P?"
Update Mechanism: Event-Driven
Filters are updated on events rather than periodic refresh:
Triggering events:
- Peer connects — exchange current filters
- Peer disconnects — remove their filter, recompute, notify other peers
- Received filter changes outgoing filter — recompute, send updates
- Local state change — new leaf dependent, become gateway, etc.
Updates are rate-limited to prevent storms during reconvergence. See fips-gossip-protocol.md §3 for FilterAnnounce wire format and exchange rules.
Filter Contents
A node's outgoing filter to peer Q contains:
- This node's own Node ID
- Node IDs of leaf-only dependents
- Entries from filters received from other peers (not Q) with TTL > 0
This creates K-hop reachability scope through TTL-based propagation.
K-Hop Scope Emergence
With TTL starting at K=2:
- Entries propagate ~2K hops before stopping
- Each node's filter contains destinations within ~4-hop effective range
- Bounded by O(d^2K) entries regardless of total network size
Expiration
Bloom filters cannot remove individual entries. Expiration is handled via:
- Peer disconnect: Remove that peer's filter entirely, recompute
- Filter replacement: Each FilterAnnounce replaces the previous one
- Implicit timeout: If no updates received from peer within threshold, consider their filter stale
Part 2: Discovery Protocol
Purpose
Discover the tree coordinates of distant destinations not covered by local Bloom filters.
When Used
- Destination not found in any peer's Bloom filter
- Route cache miss
- After cached route failure
For wire formats, see fips-gossip-protocol.md §4-5.
Discovery Flow
1. S wants to reach D, D not in any local filter
2. S checks route cache — miss
3. S creates LookupRequest with own coordinates, floods to peers
4. Request propagates (Bloom filters may help direct it)
5. Request reaches D (or node with D in filter)
6. D creates LookupResponse with its coordinates, signs it
7. Response routes back to S using S's coordinates (greedy)
8. S caches D's coordinates
9. S can now route to D using greedy tree routing
Request Propagation
Flood with TTL and visited filter:
- Send to all peers not in
visitedfilter - Each hop decrements TTL, adds self to
visited - At TTL=0, stop propagating
visitedfilter prevents redundant processing
Bloom filter assistance (optional optimization):
If a node's peer filter indicates "maybe" for the target, prioritize that direction. Reduces flood scope when target is partially in range.
Response Routing
Response uses greedy tree routing based on origin_coords from the request.
Each router forwards toward the origin using tree distance.
Security
The target signs the LookupResponse with a proof covering
(request_id || target || target_coords). Without this signature, a malicious
node could claim reachability for any target and blackhole traffic. The
signature proves the target authorized the route.
Caching
Discovered coordinates are cached:
struct RouteCache {
entries: HashMap<NodeAddr, CachedCoords>,
}
struct CachedCoords {
coords: Vec<NodeAddr>,
discovered_at: Timestamp,
last_used: Timestamp,
}
- Eviction: LRU when cache full
- Expiration: TTL-based (coordinates may go stale if target moves in tree)
- Invalidation: On route failure, evict and re-discover
Part 3: Tree Coordinates and Greedy Routing
Tree Coordinates
A node's coordinates are its ancestry path from self to root:
coords(N) = [N, Parent(N), Parent(Parent(N)), ..., Root]
Example: Node D at depth 4 has coordinates [D, P1, P2, P3, Root].
Tree Distance
Distance between two nodes is hops through their lowest common ancestor (LCA):
fn tree_distance(a_coords: &[NodeAddr], b_coords: &[NodeAddr]) -> usize {
let lca_depth = longest_common_suffix_length(a_coords, b_coords);
let a_to_lca = a_coords.len() - lca_depth;
let b_to_lca = b_coords.len() - lca_depth;
a_to_lca + b_to_lca
}
Note: Coordinates are ordered self-to-root, so common ancestry is a suffix.
Greedy Routing Algorithm
fn greedy_next_hop(&self, dest_coords: &[NodeAddr]) -> NodeAddr {
// Check if we are the destination
if dest_coords[0] == self.node_addr {
return LOCAL_DELIVERY;
}
// Check if destination is a direct peer
for peer in &self.peers {
if peer.node_addr == dest_coords[0] {
return peer.node_addr;
}
}
// Forward to peer closest to destination
self.peers
.iter()
.min_by_key(|p| tree_distance(&p.coords, dest_coords))
.map(|p| p.node_addr)
.expect("no peers")
}
Guaranteed Progress
Greedy routing makes progress as long as:
- Tree is connected
- Destination's coordinates are accurate
- Current node is not the destination
Unlike DHT routing, greedy tree routing cannot get stuck in local minima if the tree is properly formed.
What Each Node Knows
| Information | Source |
|---|---|
| Own coordinates | Spanning tree protocol (ancestry to root) |
| Each peer's coordinates | Exchanged on peering |
| Destination coordinates | From packet header (established via session) |
No global routing tables. Each node makes purely local decisions.
Privacy Considerations
Intermediate routers can observe src_addr and dest_addr in transiting packets.
This enables traffic analysis (who is communicating with whom) but not content
inspection (the payload is end-to-end encrypted with session keys).
Why source address is visible: The source address is required for routers to send error messages (CoordsRequired, PathBroken) back to the sender. This is a deliberate design choice: rather than silently dropping unroutable packets and relying on application-layer timeouts to detect failures, FIPS provides explicit feedback that allows rapid route recovery. The tradeoff favors responsiveness over metadata privacy.
Partial mitigation: FIPS addresses are derived from SHA-256(pubkey), not the
npub itself. An observer learns that fd12:3456:... is communicating with
fd78:9abc:..., but cannot directly determine the Nostr identities without
additional information (e.g., DNS lookup correlation, prior knowledge of the
address-to-npub mapping).
Alternative considered: Onion routing (like Tor) hides routing metadata from intermediate nodes but requires the sender to know the full path upfront and prevents per-hop error feedback. FIPS prioritizes low-latency greedy routing with explicit error signaling over metadata privacy.
Part 4: Route Cache Management
Wire formats: For session layer message wire formats (SessionSetup, SessionAck, DataPacket, CoordsRequired, PathBroken), see fips-session-protocol.md §8.
Route Cache Purpose
Intermediate routers cache coordinate mappings so that data packets can use minimal headers (addresses only, no coordinates). This reduces per-packet overhead from ~300 bytes to 38 bytes.
Cache Lifecycle
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 1. Discovery: S queries for D's coordinates │
│ 2. Setup: S sends SessionSetup, routers cache coordinates │
│ 3. Data: Packets carry only addresses, routers use cache │
│ 4. Refresh: Periodic or on-demand to prevent cache expiry │
│ 5. Teardown: Implicit (cache expires) or explicit │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Session Setup Flow
S R1 R2 D
│ │ │ │
│──SessionSetup─────────>│ │ │
│ (src_coords, │──SessionSetup────────>│ │
│ dest_coords) │ │──SessionSetup────────>│
│ │ │ │
│ │ cache: │ cache: │
│ │ dest_addr→dest_coords│ dest_addr→dest_coords│
│ │ src_addr→src_coords │ src_addr→src_coords │
│ │ │ │
│<─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────SessionAck───│
│ │ │ │
│══DataPacket═══════════>│══════════════════════>│══════════════════════>│
│ (addresses only) │ (use cached coords) │ (use cached coords) │
Router Behavior
impl Router {
fn handle_session_setup(&mut self, setup: SessionSetup, from: PeerId) {
// Cache coordinates for both directions
self.coord_cache.insert(setup.dest_addr, CacheEntry {
coords: setup.dest_coords.clone(),
expires: now() + CACHE_TTL,
});
self.coord_cache.insert(setup.src_addr, CacheEntry {
coords: setup.src_coords.clone(),
expires: now() + CACHE_TTL,
});
// Forward toward destination
let next = self.greedy_next_hop(&setup.dest_coords);
self.forward(next, setup);
}
fn handle_data_packet(&mut self, packet: DataPacket, from: PeerId) {
// If packet carries coordinates, cache them
if packet.flags & COORDS_PRESENT != 0 {
if let (Some(src_coords), Some(dest_coords)) =
(&packet.src_coords, &packet.dest_coords)
{
self.coord_cache.insert(packet.dest_addr, CacheEntry {
coords: dest_coords.clone(),
expires: now() + CACHE_TTL,
});
self.coord_cache.insert(packet.src_addr, CacheEntry {
coords: src_coords.clone(),
expires: now() + CACHE_TTL,
});
}
}
// Route using cache (now populated if coords were present)
match self.coord_cache.get(&packet.dest_addr) {
Some(entry) => {
entry.last_used = now();
let next = self.greedy_next_hop(&entry.coords);
self.forward(next, packet);
}
None => {
// Cache miss — request coordinates
self.send_error(from, CoordsRequired {
dest_addr: packet.dest_addr,
reporter: self.node_addr,
});
}
}
}
}
Cache Data Structure
struct CoordCache {
entries: HashMap<Ipv6Addr, CacheEntry>,
max_entries: usize,
}
struct CacheEntry {
coords: Vec<NodeAddr>,
created: Timestamp,
last_used: Timestamp,
expires: Timestamp,
}
Eviction policy: LRU (least recently used) when cache exceeds max_entries.
Expiration: Entries expire after TTL (e.g., 300 seconds). Can be refreshed by:
- Subsequent SessionSetup
- SessionRefresh message (lightweight, just touches expiry)
- Data packet transit (optional: refresh on use)
Cache Miss Recovery
When a router's cache entry is evicted mid-session:
1. Data packet arrives (minimal header), cache miss
2. Router sends CoordsRequired to packet source
3. Source marks route as cold
4. Source resends with COORDS_PRESENT flag set
5. Router caches coordinates from packet, forwards
6. After N successful packets, source clears flag
The crypto session remains active throughout—only routing state is refreshed. From application perspective: one packet delayed, transparent recovery.
Sender State Machine
impl Sender {
fn send(&mut self, dest: Ipv6Addr, data: &[u8]) {
if !self.session_established(dest) {
// Need to establish crypto session first
let dest_coords = self.discover_or_cached(dest)?;
self.send_session_setup(dest, &dest_coords);
self.await_session_ack(dest)?;
}
// Check route state
let include_coords = self.route_state(dest) == RouteCold;
self.send_data_packet(dest, data, include_coords);
}
fn handle_coords_required(&mut self, err: CoordsRequired) {
// Route cache expired at intermediate router
// Crypto session still valid - just need to re-warm route
self.mark_route_cold(err.dest_addr);
// Next send() will include coordinates
}
}
enum RouteState {
RouteWarm, // Send minimal headers
RouteCold, // Include coordinates until warm
}
Part 5: Packet Type Summary
| Type | Purpose | Size | When Used |
|---|---|---|---|
| FilterAnnounce | Bloom filter propagation | ~1 KB | Topology changes |
| LookupRequest | Discover coordinates | ~300 bytes | First contact with distant node |
| LookupResponse | Return coordinates | ~400 bytes | Reply to discovery |
| SessionSetup | Warm router caches + crypto init | ~400-700 bytes | Before data transfer |
| SessionAck | Confirm session + crypto response | ~300-500 bytes | Session confirmation |
| DataPacket | Application data | 36 bytes + payload (minimal) | Bulk of traffic |
| DataPacket | With coordinates | ~300-500 bytes + payload | After CoordsRequired |
| CoordsRequired | Request coords in next packet | ~50 bytes | Cache miss recovery |
Note
: SessionSetup/SessionAck sizes vary based on coordinate depth and whether they carry crypto handshake payloads (combined establishment per fips-session-protocol.md §3.4 and §5.1).
Part 6: Traffic Analysis
Steady State (Stable Network)
- Bloom filter traffic: Near zero (event-driven, no changes)
- Discovery traffic: Rare (warm caches)
- Session traffic: Rare (established sessions)
- Data traffic: Minimal overhead (36-byte header)
Network Churn
When nodes join/leave:
- Bloom filter updates propagate (bounded by K-hop scope)
- Affected sessions may need re-establishment
- Discovery queries for newly-joined nodes
Per-Node Resource Requirements
| Resource | Full Participant | Leaf-Only |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom filter storage | d × 1 KB (d = peer count) | None |
| Coordinate cache | 10K-100K entries | None |
| Route cache | 1K-10K entries | Minimal |
| Bandwidth (idle) | < 1 KB/sec | Near zero |
Open Questions
-
Coordinate compression: Can tree coordinates be compressed for smaller SessionSetup messages? (e.g., delta encoding, shorter node ID representation)
-
Multi-path routing: How to handle multiple valid paths? Load balancing? Failover?
-
Asymmetric paths: S→D and D→S may traverse different routers. Is this acceptable or should paths be symmetric?
-
Gateway /64 prefixes: How do subnet prefixes interact with Bloom filters and discovery? One filter entry per gateway regardless of devices behind it?
-
Cache sizing: What's the right cache size for different node roles? Core nodes vs. edge nodes?
-
Mobility: When a node changes tree position (new parent), how quickly do sessions recover? Should nodes announce position changes?
References
- fips-intro.md — Overall FIPS architecture
- fips-gossip-protocol.md — Wire formats for TreeAnnounce, FilterAnnounce, Lookup
- fips-session-protocol.md — Traffic flow, crypto sessions, terminology
- fips-wire-protocol.md — Link-layer transport and Noise IK handshake
- fips-transports.md — Transport protocol characteristics
- spanning-tree-dynamics.md — Tree protocol dynamics and convergence