From e1c63fcf56f3be8cd76b2b8f91ede5c2ee3caca6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: DanConwayDev Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 11:39:21 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] issue: complete phase 0 - all research finished --- ...r-observability-and-management-strategy.md | 21 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+) diff --git a/ec1f-administrator-observability-and-management-strategy.md b/ec1f-administrator-observability-and-management-strategy.md index 4a7ee9b..80574d4 100644 --- a/ec1f-administrator-observability-and-management-strategy.md +++ b/ec1f-administrator-observability-and-management-strategy.md @@ -470,3 +470,24 @@ The current phased roadmap above is **SUPERSEDED** pending proper planning: - `docs/research/pyramid-style-queries-design.md` - Feasibility analysis for rust-nostr - **Next:** Update strategy document to reflect HTTP-based approach for queries - Phase 0 research complete, ready to finalize architecture and proceed to Phase 1 + +### 2026-01-15 [Session 11:38] +- **Final Phase 0 research:** Explored forking rust-nostr to support pyramid-style queries +- Comprehensive analysis of what it would take to modify nostr-relay-builder +- Key findings: + - Implementation effort: 5-7 days (vs 1-2 days for HTTP NIP-86) + - Ongoing maintenance: 18-29 hours/month (vs 1-2 hours/month for HTTP) + - rust-nostr is extremely active: 305 commits in 15 days (~20/day) + - Breaking changes in ~50% of releases + - Pyramid uses khatru framework (Go), NOT nostr-relay-builder + - Upstream acceptance likelihood: Low (10-20%) +- **Final decision confirmed: HTTP-based NIP-86 is the correct approach** + - No fork needed + - Standards-compliant + - Minimal maintenance burden + - Achieves same functional goals +- Deliverable committed: + - `docs/research/rust-nostr-fork-analysis.md` - Complete fork analysis (1,316 lines) +- **Phase 0 research COMPLETE** ✅ +- All 4 research documents committed and ready for review +- Ready to update strategy document and begin Phase 1 implementation