mirror of
https://github.com/jmcorgan/fips.git
synced 2026-10-05 19:18:25 +00:00
Johnathan Corgan
73e33158c4
Four path assertions failed with a bare exit, printing neither what they expected nor what they saw, and triggering none of the scenario diagnostics their siblings already call. A red nat-symmetric run said only that a path check failed, which is why the 2026-08-13 master failure could not be diagnosed and why the load-dependent flake behind it has never been root-caused. Both helpers now report the container, the expectation, what was actually observed and a projection of the peer or link table, and separate a failed fipsctl exec from unparseable output from a genuine mismatch. All twelve call sites dump the scenario diagnostics on failure, in the same shape the surrounding wait_for_peers calls already use. The projected field names are read from the control-socket query implementation rather than guessed. A passing assertion prints nothing. No retry was added. A bounded retry is listed as a possibility in the issue, but it would suppress exactly the transient that needs to be caught; the right order is to let the next red print its state first.
NAT Lab Harness
Real Docker-based NAT traversal integration tests for the mainline FIPS Nostr/STUN bootstrap path.
This harness spins up:
- two FIPS nodes
- a local Nostr relay
- a local STUN server
- one or two Linux router containers performing NAT with
iptables
For the NAT scenarios, the node LAN interfaces are not attached to
Docker bridge networks. The harness creates explicit veth pairs and
moves them into the node and router namespaces after docker compose up
so every packet must traverse the router namespace.
It covers three scenarios:
cone: both peers behind explicit namespace/veth full-cone emulation, UDP traversal succeedssymmetric: both peers behind symmetric-style NAT, UDP traversal fails, TCP fallback succeedslan: both peers share a LAN subnet, LAN targets are preferred over reflexive addresses
NAT model notes
The harness does not rely on plain Docker MASQUERADE for the cone case.
cone- uses explicit full-cone emulation in the router namespace
- outbound UDP is
SNATed to the router WAN address while preserving the source port - inbound UDP to the router WAN address is
DNATed back to the single LAN host regardless of remote source
symmetric- uses UDP
MASQUERADE --random-fully - outbound mappings may be port-randomized and are only reopened by matching conntrack state
- uses UDP
This distinction matters because plain MASQUERADE is convenient source NAT, but it does not by itself model the "accept from any remote once mapped" behavior expected from a full-cone NAT.
Prerequisites
- Docker with Compose support
- locally built
fips-test:latest
Build the test image with:
./testing/scripts/build.sh
Run
Run all scenarios:
./testing/nat/scripts/nat-test.sh
Run one scenario:
./testing/nat/scripts/nat-test.sh cone
./testing/nat/scripts/nat-test.sh symmetric
./testing/nat/scripts/nat-test.sh lan
Layout
docker-compose.yml- relay/STUN/WAN topology plus container definitions
node/- node bootstrap wrapper that waits for the injected veth interface
router/- NAT router image and
iptablessetup
- NAT router image and
stun/- minimal STUN binding responder
relay/- local
strfryconfig
- local
scripts/generate-configs.sh- derives ephemeral identities and writes per-scenario FIPS configs
scripts/setup-topology.sh- injects and configures the NAT LAN
vethpairs in the container namespaces
- injects and configures the NAT LAN
scripts/nat-test.sh- boots the lab, waits for convergence, and asserts the resulting path
Assertions
-
cone- both nodes connect
- connected transport is UDP
- active link remote addresses are on the WAN NAT subnet
-
symmetric- NAT bootstrap does not establish a UDP link
- fallback converges
- connected transport is TCP via router-published WAN addresses
-
lan- both nodes connect
- connected transport is UDP
- active link remote addresses stay on the shared LAN subnet