Files
fips/testing/nat
Johnathan Corgan cbbdf2c13c Stop the firewall and ACL suites rebuilding an image their caller supplied
Both suites ran `docker compose up -d --build` unconditionally, and their
compose files carry both a build context and an image name, so the flag
rebuilt and retagged the shared test image from the shared build context on
every run. Their --skip-build flag did not cover it: it guarded only the
Rust build above. Under a harness that has already built the image and
handed it over, that rebuild can only replace the binaries under test with
whatever the shared context currently holds.

The nat scripts had the mirror-image problem. Their image guard built a
replacement whenever the image was missing, which is right by hand and
wrong under a harness: when the caller names an image it built, a miss
means something upstream is broken, and manufacturing a substitute hides
that. They now fail loudly in that case and keep building only on the hand
path. The mesh-lab guard reads the same variable and its build hint moves
to the script that still produces the shared tag.
2026-07-26 15:37:50 +00:00
..

NAT Lab Harness

Real Docker-based NAT traversal integration tests for the mainline FIPS Nostr/STUN bootstrap path.

This harness spins up:

  • two FIPS nodes
  • a local Nostr relay
  • a local STUN server
  • one or two Linux router containers performing NAT with iptables

For the NAT scenarios, the node LAN interfaces are not attached to Docker bridge networks. The harness creates explicit veth pairs and moves them into the node and router namespaces after docker compose up so every packet must traverse the router namespace.

It covers three scenarios:

  • cone: both peers behind explicit namespace/veth full-cone emulation, UDP traversal succeeds
  • symmetric: both peers behind symmetric-style NAT, UDP traversal fails, TCP fallback succeeds
  • lan: both peers share a LAN subnet, LAN targets are preferred over reflexive addresses

NAT model notes

The harness does not rely on plain Docker MASQUERADE for the cone case.

  • cone
    • uses explicit full-cone emulation in the router namespace
    • outbound UDP is SNATed to the router WAN address while preserving the source port
    • inbound UDP to the router WAN address is DNATed back to the single LAN host regardless of remote source
  • symmetric
    • uses UDP MASQUERADE --random-fully
    • outbound mappings may be port-randomized and are only reopened by matching conntrack state

This distinction matters because plain MASQUERADE is convenient source NAT, but it does not by itself model the "accept from any remote once mapped" behavior expected from a full-cone NAT.

Prerequisites

  • Docker with Compose support
  • locally built fips-test:latest

Build the test image with:

./testing/scripts/build.sh

Run

Run all scenarios:

./testing/nat/scripts/nat-test.sh

Run one scenario:

./testing/nat/scripts/nat-test.sh cone
./testing/nat/scripts/nat-test.sh symmetric
./testing/nat/scripts/nat-test.sh lan

Layout

  • docker-compose.yml
    • relay/STUN/WAN topology plus container definitions
  • node/
    • node bootstrap wrapper that waits for the injected veth interface
  • router/
    • NAT router image and iptables setup
  • stun/
    • minimal STUN binding responder
  • relay/
    • local strfry config
  • scripts/generate-configs.sh
    • derives ephemeral identities and writes per-scenario FIPS configs
  • scripts/setup-topology.sh
    • injects and configures the NAT LAN veth pairs in the container namespaces
  • scripts/nat-test.sh
    • boots the lab, waits for convergence, and asserts the resulting path

Assertions

  • cone

    • both nodes connect
    • connected transport is UDP
    • active link remote addresses are on the WAN NAT subnet
  • symmetric

    • NAT bootstrap does not establish a UDP link
    • fallback converges
    • connected transport is TCP via router-published WAN addresses
  • lan

    • both nodes connect
    • connected transport is UDP
    • active link remote addresses stay on the shared LAN subnet