Files
fips/testing/nat
Johnathan Corgan a718cef8ce Have every suite compose file name the caller's test image
Only the static family read FIPS_TEST_IMAGE; the firewall, ACL, nat,
sidecar and both Tor compose files named the shared mutable tag directly,
which is why the local CI runner has to retag its per-run image to that
name. They now take the same defaulted form the static file already uses,
so a harness run resolves the image it built and a bare hand run still
resolves the shared tag exactly as before.

Checked by rendering each file through `docker compose config` with the
variables set: every service resolves to the supplied name and none is
left naming the shared tag.
2026-07-26 15:38:28 +00:00
..

NAT Lab Harness

Real Docker-based NAT traversal integration tests for the mainline FIPS Nostr/STUN bootstrap path.

This harness spins up:

  • two FIPS nodes
  • a local Nostr relay
  • a local STUN server
  • one or two Linux router containers performing NAT with iptables

For the NAT scenarios, the node LAN interfaces are not attached to Docker bridge networks. The harness creates explicit veth pairs and moves them into the node and router namespaces after docker compose up so every packet must traverse the router namespace.

It covers three scenarios:

  • cone: both peers behind explicit namespace/veth full-cone emulation, UDP traversal succeeds
  • symmetric: both peers behind symmetric-style NAT, UDP traversal fails, TCP fallback succeeds
  • lan: both peers share a LAN subnet, LAN targets are preferred over reflexive addresses

NAT model notes

The harness does not rely on plain Docker MASQUERADE for the cone case.

  • cone
    • uses explicit full-cone emulation in the router namespace
    • outbound UDP is SNATed to the router WAN address while preserving the source port
    • inbound UDP to the router WAN address is DNATed back to the single LAN host regardless of remote source
  • symmetric
    • uses UDP MASQUERADE --random-fully
    • outbound mappings may be port-randomized and are only reopened by matching conntrack state

This distinction matters because plain MASQUERADE is convenient source NAT, but it does not by itself model the "accept from any remote once mapped" behavior expected from a full-cone NAT.

Prerequisites

  • Docker with Compose support
  • locally built fips-test:latest

Build the test image with:

./testing/scripts/build.sh

Run

Run all scenarios:

./testing/nat/scripts/nat-test.sh

Run one scenario:

./testing/nat/scripts/nat-test.sh cone
./testing/nat/scripts/nat-test.sh symmetric
./testing/nat/scripts/nat-test.sh lan

Layout

  • docker-compose.yml
    • relay/STUN/WAN topology plus container definitions
  • node/
    • node bootstrap wrapper that waits for the injected veth interface
  • router/
    • NAT router image and iptables setup
  • stun/
    • minimal STUN binding responder
  • relay/
    • local strfry config
  • scripts/generate-configs.sh
    • derives ephemeral identities and writes per-scenario FIPS configs
  • scripts/setup-topology.sh
    • injects and configures the NAT LAN veth pairs in the container namespaces
  • scripts/nat-test.sh
    • boots the lab, waits for convergence, and asserts the resulting path

Assertions

  • cone

    • both nodes connect
    • connected transport is UDP
    • active link remote addresses are on the WAN NAT subnet
  • symmetric

    • NAT bootstrap does not establish a UDP link
    • fallback converges
    • connected transport is TCP via router-published WAN addresses
  • lan

    • both nodes connect
    • connected transport is UDP
    • active link remote addresses stay on the shared LAN subnet