Files
fips/testing/nat
Johnathan Corgan 2fdc831ce3 Claim the NAT lab's two bridges per run and derive every address from them
The NAT lab was the last suite pinning fixed IPv4 subnets, so two overlapping
runs collided on the wan and shared-lan bridges.

Each run now claims a free /24 for each bridge, scanning candidates and
advancing on an overlap while still failing fast on any other network-create
error. The claim exports NAT_WAN_PREFIX and NAT_LAN_PREFIX, and every routable
address in the compose file and the suite scripts derives from them, with
defaults that render exactly what the lab used before. The router-side LANs are
deliberately left pinned: they live inside per-container network namespaces,
never become docker networks, and cannot collide.

An external-network overlay lets the suites attach to the networks the run
already claimed instead of creating their own. Two of the three suite scripts
had no overlay hook, so they would have requested the claimed range a second
time; both now have one.

Host veth names are scoped by a short token rather than the full run id, which
overruns the fifteen-character interface-name limit at the default run-id
length, and the cleanup reaper's pattern is widened to match the new shape.

Networks are released inline on every exit path rather than in a trap, since a
trap written inside a shell function replaces the script-level handler and
would disable the whole run's teardown.
2026-07-27 14:34:46 +00:00
..

NAT Lab Harness

Real Docker-based NAT traversal integration tests for the mainline FIPS Nostr/STUN bootstrap path.

This harness spins up:

  • two FIPS nodes
  • a local Nostr relay
  • a local STUN server
  • one or two Linux router containers performing NAT with iptables

For the NAT scenarios, the node LAN interfaces are not attached to Docker bridge networks. The harness creates explicit veth pairs and moves them into the node and router namespaces after docker compose up so every packet must traverse the router namespace.

It covers three scenarios:

  • cone: both peers behind explicit namespace/veth full-cone emulation, UDP traversal succeeds
  • symmetric: both peers behind symmetric-style NAT, UDP traversal fails, TCP fallback succeeds
  • lan: both peers share a LAN subnet, LAN targets are preferred over reflexive addresses

NAT model notes

The harness does not rely on plain Docker MASQUERADE for the cone case.

  • cone
    • uses explicit full-cone emulation in the router namespace
    • outbound UDP is SNATed to the router WAN address while preserving the source port
    • inbound UDP to the router WAN address is DNATed back to the single LAN host regardless of remote source
  • symmetric
    • uses UDP MASQUERADE --random-fully
    • outbound mappings may be port-randomized and are only reopened by matching conntrack state

This distinction matters because plain MASQUERADE is convenient source NAT, but it does not by itself model the "accept from any remote once mapped" behavior expected from a full-cone NAT.

Prerequisites

  • Docker with Compose support
  • locally built fips-test:latest

Build the test image with:

./testing/scripts/build.sh

Run

Run all scenarios:

./testing/nat/scripts/nat-test.sh

Run one scenario:

./testing/nat/scripts/nat-test.sh cone
./testing/nat/scripts/nat-test.sh symmetric
./testing/nat/scripts/nat-test.sh lan

Layout

  • docker-compose.yml
    • relay/STUN/WAN topology plus container definitions
  • node/
    • node bootstrap wrapper that waits for the injected veth interface
  • router/
    • NAT router image and iptables setup
  • stun/
    • minimal STUN binding responder
  • relay/
    • local strfry config
  • scripts/generate-configs.sh
    • derives ephemeral identities and writes per-scenario FIPS configs
  • scripts/setup-topology.sh
    • injects and configures the NAT LAN veth pairs in the container namespaces
  • scripts/nat-test.sh
    • boots the lab, waits for convergence, and asserts the resulting path

Assertions

  • cone

    • both nodes connect
    • connected transport is UDP
    • active link remote addresses are on the WAN NAT subnet
  • symmetric

    • NAT bootstrap does not establish a UDP link
    • fallback converges
    • connected transport is TCP via router-published WAN addresses
  • lan

    • both nodes connect
    • connected transport is UDP
    • active link remote addresses stay on the shared LAN subnet