A client process opens a flow to a peer's public key on a chosen port and sends and receives datagrams on a file descriptor the daemon hands it. No IPv6 emulation, no TUN device, no DNS: a datagram travels from key to key. The feature is off by default and is not a stable interface. The wire needs no change and gets none. Every FSP data packet has carried a port pair inside its AEAD envelope since v0.2.0, and port 256 is simply the IPv6 shim. What was missing was a way for a program to ask for a port of its own and be handed the traffic. Addressing is the part worth reading twice, because the obvious design is wrong. The x-only public key is the address. An npub is that key written in bech32, so converting between them is a local encoding rather than a lookup or a name service. The 16-byte node address that travels on the wire is the first half of a SHA-256 of the key: it is a truncated hash, it does not invert, and it appears nowhere a client can see. An earlier iteration of this work reported a peer by that hash and could supply a key only sometimes, which is what treating a wire identifier as an identity produces. An accepted flow therefore always knows its peer. The key is captured where the peer is authenticated rather than looked up when a report is rendered: every inbound datagram passes one call site inside a handler that refuses anything whose session is not established, and the responder has already rejected the session unless the claimed address derives from the key it proved. Reaching for the identity cache instead gives a best-effort answer from a structure that evicts. A listener is a descriptor. The daemon writes one message per arrival to it, carrying the new flow's descriptor and the peer's address, so poll, select and epoll work on a listener and accepting is a recvmsg. That is what lets the API be used from a program that already has an event loop, which a command-and-reply listener could not support: an arrival could not be waited on beside anything else. There is no accept command and no reject command. Refusing a flow is closing the descriptor you were handed. The Rust surface mirrors std::net. FipsStream::connect, FipsListener::bind, incoming, accept, io::Result and an errno mapping rather than a bespoke error type. An address is given as an npub, as a key, or as a pair, through one parameter, the way ToSocketAddrs takes several spellings of one thing. Each type holds its descriptor and copies of what setup told it and nothing else, so a stream that outlives its setup connection is not representable. set_nonblocking, AsFd and the four deadline methods carry the names and signatures std::net uses for the same jobs. They were asked for by a user integrating the API with tokio: AsyncFd requires a non-blocking descriptor, and anything receiving from a peer needs a bounded wait. AsFd is the better of the two descriptor accessors, because the borrow cannot outlive the value that owns the descriptor, so a reactor cannot hold a registration for a descriptor that has since been closed and its number reused by the next open. The non-blocking flag is read, modified and written back rather than assigned, since the flag word carries more than that one bit and a caller may have set O_ASYNC. A zero timeout is refused with EINVAL, because the kernel reads a zero timeval as "wait for ever", which inverts what a caller passing zero means; std::net refuses it for the same reason. The two directions are separate options and stay that way. FipsListener gets no timeout methods, matching TcpListener: bounding an accept is set_nonblocking plus the caller's own poll, which the reactor how-to builds. A flow taken from accept is blocking whatever the listener was set to, because the two are separate sockets and the daemon hands over a fresh one. One rule has no counterpart in Berkeley sockets and a client author must know it: the v1 wire carries no half-close, so nothing peer-driven ever closes a flow. A server written to read until the flow ends waits for a signal that cannot arrive, holding a thread and a flow per peer until its process exits. A program decides its own termination, and the example serves one datagram per flow. The tests reach a live daemon rather than a stand-in. Every public item had a unit test against a hand-written stand-in with canned replies, and the five entry points a program actually calls first, connect, connect_from, connect_at, bind and the SOCKET constant, had no coverage of any kind, because the tests that appear to cover them build a Wire over a socket pair and hand it to the private open and hold, so nothing ever resolved a socket path or mapped its errors. examples/native-surface.rs walks all thirty-eight items against a running daemon and reports the number of assertions it made. The count is read from the recorder rather than written as a literal, and the harness asserts the exit status, the completion marker and the count together, so deleting an assertion fails the check rather than quietly shrinking it. Watchdogs turn a hang into a named failure, which several of the walked behaviours would otherwise produce. The shared Docker image is built once for every integration leg, so the new binary is staged at all ten places the existing one is, the interop builder included, which gets a stub because those images exercise the wire between daemon versions and older refs do not carry the example. The platform gating was tested rather than reasoned about: flipping all eleven gates so the native API is excluded leaves the crate compiling clean across the workspace, every target and the profiling feature. The shipped docs tree gains what only the LaTeX manual under design/ had, which is not published with the daemon. A reference entry covers the whole surface: addressing and the port tiers, the Berkeley mapping, every method on FipsAddr, FipsStream, FipsListener and Incoming, the errno table, the ceilings, the four places data disappears with nothing reported, the line protocol and the command reference. The errno table gives names rather than numbers, since the client maps each name onto the libc constant for the platform it was built for and the supported platforms disagree on the numbers. A tutorial side trip stands up two throwaway nodes on one machine, peered over loopback UDP with no TUN and no DNS, then writes a listening program and a connecting program against them; it needs neither the public mesh nor root, because the native path is the one that does not go through the IPv6 adapter. The obligations a client in another language carries are a how-to of their own, since they are a task rather than a description: reading the setup connection with recvmsg, associating a descriptor with the last complete line, telling an empty datagram from a close, and six others. Serving many peers from one poll loop is another, with the whole program, because the straightforward listener spawns a thread per flow and that is wrong at the node's ceiling of 256. The drop causes are a table mapping each of the seven texts DropReason::as_str produces to the counter it increments, with drop_oversize called out as the ninth counter that is not in the table. What a daemon restart costs is a section of its own: every flow and listener ends, descriptors do not survive, there is no resumption, and datagrams sent but not yet forwarded are lost through a window nothing bounds. A stack comparison diagram places the interface against the stack a reader already knows: the same application over HTTP, TLS, TCP, IP and Ethernet on one side, and over its own format, FSP, FMP and a FIPS transport on the other, aligned so each row is one concern. The two columns are not alternatives and are not drawn as such. An unmodified IPv6 program's packets reach fips0, and the adapter hands each one to FSP as a payload, so the left stack runs inside the right one; the left column ends at a fork, eth0 for the ordinary internet and fips0 for the mesh, and an arrow leaves fips0 and runs back up into FSP's input. The row where TCP would be is empty on purpose and names Reliable Object Delivery, which is where that capability is expected to land. ROD is a v2 capability, the box is dashed because none of it exists yet, and the design entry says the part a reader needs most: nothing on the surface anticipates it, so a program written today should assume it does not exist. Both endpoints carry a scheme and a worked port, https://<npub>.fips:443 and fips://<npub>:443, with a footnote saying the two ports are not the same kind of thing, a TCP port inside the tunnel on the left and an FSP port on the right. The fips:// form is a coinage: nothing in the tree parses it, nothing registers the scheme, and the API takes a key and a port as separate arguments rather than a URL. The diagram also says where the right column stops, since FIPS over UDP still rides IP and Ethernet beneath. It appears in fips-concepts.md and fips-ipv6-adapter.md, which were making its argument in prose without a picture, and deliberately not in fips-architecture.md, which already carries the OSI mapping and makes the same point about the transport row. The gateway's control socket moves onto the same bind policy this API uses, which is the one change here that touches deployed behaviour: fips-gateway now tightens /run/fips to 0750. That is unreachable under the packaged deployment, where fips.service has already created the directory at that mode, and reachable for a source build or a container that starts the gateway alone. One changelog entry under Added, describing the released state: what a client opens and reads, the addressing and why the node address is not it, the listener being a descriptor, the std::net shape of the Rust surface, and the one rule Berkeley sockets have no counterpart for. It says in as many words that the wire is unchanged.
7.7 KiB
Native Datagram API
The native datagram API lets a local program move bytes between two public keys
over FSP, with no IPv6 emulation and no TUN device in the path. A program calls
connect for a flow to a public key and a port, or bind for a port to receive
flows on, and from then on uses ordinary socket calls.
This document explains what the interface is for and where its edges are. For the surface itself — every type, method, errno and command — see ../reference/native-api.md. For the steps to enable it and write a program, see ../how-to/use-the-native-datagram-api.md.
Where it sits
The two endpoints at the top are the same node reached two ways. The
fips:// form is illustrative: no code in this repository parses it, nothing
registers the scheme, and the API takes a key and a port as separate arguments
rather than a URL. It is drawn because it is the shape an address takes on that
side, against a .fips name the adapter's DNS really does resolve.
Read row by row, the native path replaces three layers and declines to replace a fourth. FSP takes TLS's place and anchors trust in the key rather than in a certificate authority. FMP takes IPv6's place and routes by spanning tree and bloom filter rather than by address prefix, with the address derived from the key. The transport layer takes the medium's place and can be several media at once.
There is nothing where TCP was, and on the native path that is the single most consequential row today. No acknowledgement, no retransmission, no ordering and no flow control: a program that needs any of them builds it into its own payload.
That row is marked ROD — Reliable Object Delivery, which is where the capability is expected to land. ROD is a v2 capability and is not in v1; it may be pulled forward. Until it is, treat the row as empty and design around it, because a program written against a reliability layer that is not there yet fails in the ways this document's "not a reliability layer" section describes.
The two paths are not alternatives at the bottom. They converge. An
unmodified IPv6 program does not stop at a wire: its packets reach fips0, and
the adapter hands each one to FSP as a payload. That is the arrow running up the
middle of the diagram, and it is why the left stack is drawn ending at an
interface rather than at Ethernet.
So the whole left column runs inside the right one. TCP included — which
is the practical answer to the empty row above it. A program that needs a
reliable ordered stream over the mesh already has one: run it over fips0 and
let TCP do what TCP does, inside FSP's encryption. What the native API offers
instead is the same mesh with four layers of machinery removed, for a program
willing to do without them.
The bottom of the diagram is not always the bottom of the stack either. When FIPS overlays an existing network its transport is UDP, which still rides IP and Ethernet beneath; when the mesh is the network, a transport sits on a link directly.
What it is instead of
The fastest way to place the interface is by contrast with the TUN device, which is the other way a program gets FIPS traffic.
| TUN interface | Native datagram API | |
|---|---|---|
| Addressing | IPv6 address | public key, written as an npub |
| Name resolution | DNS over the mesh | none: the program supplies the key |
| Kernel object | TUN device, routes | a FipsStream per peer |
| Encapsulation | IPv6 emulated over FSP | FSP port pair, no IP layer |
| Program sees | an IP network | a FipsStream |
| Privilege | CAP_NET_ADMIN to create the device |
membership of group fips |
| Demultiplexing | by address and port | by flow, one stream each |
The IPv6 emulation is not removed by this interface. It continues to run beside it on FSP port 256, which is why that port and the tier around it are refused to a program. What the native API removes is a program's dependence on it: a program that wants to move bytes between two known public keys no longer has to acquire an IPv6 address, resolve a name, and hand its payload to a protocol stack that will encapsulate it again.
Both paths reach the same place. A native datagram and an emulated IPv6 packet are both FSP payloads with a port pair, carried in the same encrypted session to the same peer. The difference is entirely on the local side of the daemon.
Status
The wire is connected: a datagram sent on a flow leaves the node over FSP, and one arriving on a held port reaches its flow.
The interface around it is experimental. It is not versioned, it has no compatibility promise, and three of its five commands exist only to let the daemon's own checks drive the receive path without a peer. It is Linux and FreeBSD only, and it is off by default.
What this is not
Not a stable interface. It is an experiment on the v1 wire. Names, fields, reply shapes and the command set may change without a deprecation cycle.
Not the v2 process API. The v2 external process API is a separate and later design, which retires ports entirely in favour of a listener, connection and stream model. Nothing here governs it and nothing there governs this. The one thing this interface takes from that work is the FSP port tiers, because port 256 already carries the IPv6 shim on the deployed wire and a new service must not collide with it.
Not a reliability layer. There is no acknowledgement, no retransmission, no
ordering guarantee and no flow control between the two ends. A datagram is
carried or it is dropped. Some drops are counted inside the daemon and none are
reported to a program for real traffic. A program that needs delivery guarantees
builds them itself, on top, in the payload — or runs over fips0 and lets TCP
provide them.
Reliable Object Delivery (ROD) is the v2 capability intended to fill this gap, and it may be pulled forward into v1. Nothing here anticipates it: no field, reply shape or command on this surface is reserved for it, and a program written today should assume it does not exist.
Not an authorization boundary. The socket's group ownership is the whole of
the access control. Any process that can open it can send as this node's identity
and can receive mesh traffic on any port it can claim, and there is no per-program
separation beyond the port registry. Because the descriptor carries the flow, a
process handed one over SCM_RIGHTS can send as this node on that flow without
ever opening the socket. See
../reference/security.md.
Not multi-tenant. max_flows is node-wide with no per-program share, so one
program can exhaust it, and every other program then sees EMFILE on connect
and silent drops on its listeners.
Not a connection in the TCP sense. A successful connect is a local
registration and contacts no peer. There is no handshake, no keepalive and no
notification that a peer went away. A flow ends when its descriptor closes, and
in no other way. In particular a peer cannot end your flow: it has no close to
send. That single fact shapes every program written against this interface,
and the consequences are drawn out in
../how-to/use-the-native-datagram-api.md.
See also
- fips-session-layer.md — FSP, which carries the datagrams and owns the port pair
- fips-ipv6-adapter.md — the other consumer of FSP, and what this interface is an alternative to
- ../reference/native-api.md — the surface, the line protocol and the command reference