End-to-end exercise the v0.3.0 nftables firewall baseline so the
security claim — "services on fips0 are not exposed by default" — is
validated in CI rather than by operator opt-in. The packaging postinst
state is pinned by the deb-install matrix; this suite pins the actual
ruleset behavior.
testing/firewall/ — new directory mirroring the acl-allowlist
precedent (kept in its own directory, not extending testing/static):
docker-compose.yml (52 lines): two FIPS containers on bridge
172.32.0.0/24, peered over UDP/2121. node-b mounts
packaging/common/fips.nft RO at /etc/fips/fips.nft and a generated
drop-in services.nft at /etc/fips/fips.d/.
test.sh (247 lines): four-case asserter
(a) curl from node-a to node-b:8000 → DROP (port not allowlisted;
terminal counter drop fires)
(b) curl from node-b to node-a:8000 → 200 OK (reply traverses
node-b's ct state established,related accept)
(c) ping6 a→b → success (icmpv6 echo-request accept)
(d) nc -z a→b:22 → success (drop-in tcp dport 22 accept honored
via include "/etc/fips/fips.d/*.nft")
Plus drop-counter check after case (a) confirms the dropped
connection actually hit the chain's terminal counter drop.
generate-configs.sh (111 lines): mirrors acl-allowlist generator,
produces the drop-in services.nft + fips configs.
README.md (111 lines): how to run, expected output, design notes.
.gitignore: ignores generated-configs/.
testing/ci-local.sh: FIREWALL_SUITES=(firewall) array + run_firewall
runner; dispatch in run_integration and run_suite mirroring
run_acl_allowlist.
.github/workflows/ci.yml: matrix row {suite: firewall, type:
firewall} + 3 steps gated on matrix.type == 'firewall' between
acl-allowlist and gateway. Reuses fips-linux artifact + fips-test:
latest image.
Activation note: the unified test image does not run systemd, so
test.sh invokes the fips-firewall.service ExecStart
(/usr/sbin/nft -f /etc/fips/fips.nft) directly. The systemd-unit
enablement path is covered by the deb-install matrix; this suite
exercises what the unit configures, not how it gets started.
FIPS Testing
Integration and simulation test harnesses for FIPS, using Docker containers running the full protocol stack.
Test Harnesses
static/ -- Static Docker Network
Fixed topologies with manual scripts for building, config generation, connectivity tests (ping, iperf), and network impairment (netem). Useful for deterministic debugging and validating specific topology configurations.
| Topology | Nodes | Transport | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| mesh | 5 | UDP | Sparse mesh, 6 links, multi-hop |
| chain | 5 | UDP | Linear chain, max 4-hop paths |
| mesh-public | 5+1 | UDP | Mesh with external public node |
| tcp-chain | 3 | TCP | Linear chain over TCP (port 8443) |
| rekey | 5 | UDP | Rekey integration test topology |
tor/ -- Tor Transport Integration
End-to-end Tor transport testing with Docker containers running real Tor daemons. Requires internet access for Tor bootstrapping.
| Scenario | Description |
|---|---|
| socks5-outbound | Outbound SOCKS5 connections through Tor to clearnet peer |
| directory-mode | Inbound via HiddenServiceDir onion service (co-located) |
nat/ -- NAT Traversal Lab
Real Docker NAT traversal tests for the Nostr/STUN bootstrap path,
using router containers with iptables-based NAT, a local Nostr relay,
and a local STUN responder.
| Scenario | Description |
|---|---|
| cone | Two NATed peers establish a UDP traversal path |
| symmetric | UDP traversal fails under symmetric NAT, TCP fallback wins |
| lan | Peers on the same LAN prefer local addresses over reflexive |
chaos/ -- Stochastic Simulation
Automated network testing with configurable node counts, topology algorithms (random geometric, Erdos-Renyi, chain, explicit), and fault injection (netem mutation, link flaps, traffic generation, node churn). 20 scenarios covering general stress testing, cost-based parent selection, mixed link technologies (fiber/Bluetooth/WiFi), transport-specific validation (UDP, TCP, Ethernet), and ECN/congestion testing. Scenarios are defined in YAML and executed via a Python harness that manages the full lifecycle: topology generation, Docker orchestration, fault scheduling, log collection, and analysis.