mirror of
https://github.com/jmcorgan/fips.git
synced 2026-10-05 19:18:25 +00:00
Two test helpers piped a heredoc into `docker exec <container> python3 -` with no `-i`. Without it docker attaches no stdin, so `python3 -` reads an empty program, runs nothing and exits 0; `set -euo pipefail` cannot catch a success. Measured on this host at docker 29.1.3 against a live container: without the flag the program produced no output and returned 0, with it the program ran. The relay half is the serious one. The publisher it silently skipped is the malformed Kind-37195 event that phase 3 exists to inject, and the three assertions that follow hold whether or not anything was injected, so the phase has passed in all 51 archived runs without exercising the path it covers. The NAT half only makes a diagnostic vacuous, but it did real damage once: every tcpdump wrapped around the STUN probe reported 0 packets captured, and that was read as a packet leaving the node and vanishing. Adding `-i` alone is not enough. The publisher printed its completion line unconditionally, after reading the relay's reply and discarding it, so a refused event would still have satisfied a check that only looked for that line. strfry verifies the event id and the signature and answers ["OK",<id>,false,"invalid: ..."] on refusal, and a refused event is never stored and never broadcast. The publisher now parses the relay's verdict and exits non-zero on anything but an acceptance, and phase 3 reds unless the relay reports the event stored. The verdict is read by decoding the websocket frame rather than by matching a substring. NIP-01's OK is a four-element array whose message is mandatory even on success, so `,true]` never occurs in a conformant acceptance; and a 91-byte payload puts a literal '[' in the frame's length byte, so searching for the JSON finds the header. Both were found by testing the guard against frames built the way a relay builds them. Three comments are corrected while here. The publisher's header claimed the daemons log a parse error and that the content fails to deserialize; neither holds, because the `protocol` tag is checked first and the discard emits no diagnostic. The kind and `d` tag are now documented as duplicating the consumers' subscription filter, which is what makes them able to drift. Expect phase 3 to exercise the missing-protocol-tag branch for the first time. A red there is a finding rather than a regression this introduces.
NAT Lab Harness
Real Docker-based NAT traversal integration tests for the mainline FIPS Nostr/STUN bootstrap path.
This harness spins up:
- two FIPS nodes
- a local Nostr relay
- a local STUN server
- one or two Linux router containers performing NAT with
iptables
For the NAT scenarios, the node LAN interfaces are not attached to
Docker bridge networks. The harness creates explicit veth pairs and
moves them into the node and router namespaces after docker compose up
so every packet must traverse the router namespace.
It covers three scenarios:
cone: both peers behind explicit namespace/veth full-cone emulation, UDP traversal succeedssymmetric: both peers behind symmetric-style NAT, UDP traversal fails, TCP fallback succeedslan: both peers share a LAN subnet, LAN targets are preferred over reflexive addresses
NAT model notes
The harness does not rely on plain Docker MASQUERADE for the cone case.
cone- uses explicit full-cone emulation in the router namespace
- outbound UDP is
SNATed to the router WAN address while preserving the source port - inbound UDP to the router WAN address is
DNATed back to the single LAN host regardless of remote source
symmetric- uses UDP
MASQUERADE --random-fully - outbound mappings may be port-randomized and are only reopened by matching conntrack state
- uses UDP
This distinction matters because plain MASQUERADE is convenient source NAT, but it does not by itself model the "accept from any remote once mapped" behavior expected from a full-cone NAT.
Prerequisites
- Docker with Compose support
- locally built
fips-test:latest
Build the test image with:
./testing/scripts/build.sh
Run
Run all scenarios:
./testing/nat/scripts/nat-test.sh
Run one scenario:
./testing/nat/scripts/nat-test.sh cone
./testing/nat/scripts/nat-test.sh symmetric
./testing/nat/scripts/nat-test.sh lan
Layout
docker-compose.yml- relay/STUN/WAN topology plus container definitions
node/- node bootstrap wrapper that waits for the injected veth interface
router/- NAT router image and
iptablessetup
- NAT router image and
stun/- minimal STUN binding responder
relay/- local
strfryconfig
- local
scripts/generate-configs.sh- derives ephemeral identities and writes per-scenario FIPS configs
scripts/setup-topology.sh- injects and configures the NAT LAN
vethpairs in the container namespaces
- injects and configures the NAT LAN
scripts/nat-test.sh- boots the lab, waits for convergence, and asserts the resulting path
scripts/nostr-relay-test.sh- exercises the Nostr overlay advert publish/consume round-trip, including rejection of a malformed advert event
scripts/stun-faults-test.sh- cycles the daemon through STUN drop, delay and outage faults and asserts graceful behavior at each step
Assertions
-
cone- both nodes connect
- connected transport is UDP
- active link remote addresses are on the WAN NAT subnet
-
symmetric- NAT bootstrap does not establish a UDP link
- fallback converges
- connected transport is TCP via router-published WAN addresses
-
lan- both nodes connect
- connected transport is UDP
- active link remote addresses stay on the shared LAN subnet