mirror of
https://github.com/vitorpamplona/amethyst.git
synced 2026-08-09 08:04:45 +00:00
Vitor PamplonaandClaude Opus 5
8c9475a3fb
Completes the sweep: all 343 filters that reach a relay now carry a SubPurpose,
so `client.activeRequests(relay)` can answer "what is this relay doing for me?"
for every connection, not just the three assemblers wired as proof.
Scope was bigger than the "12 assemblers" first estimated — that count was files
calling newSubId(). The real target is filters wrapped in RelayBasedFilter, since
those are the ones that reach the wire: 202 files. The other ~400 `Filter(` sites
in the app query LocalCache and never leave the device, so they are deliberately
untouched.
Purposes assigned by subsystem: DIRECT_MESSAGES for the DM/giftwrap paths,
NOTIFICATIONS for the inbox filters, FOLLOW_LISTS / PROFILE_METADATA /
RELAY_LISTS for the account loaders, CHATS for public channels, relay groups,
Concord, nests and Marmot, HOME_FEED for the follow feed, WALLET for Cashu and
nutzaps, and SCREEN_CONTENT for everything opened on demand (thread, profile,
hashtag, video, polls, music, podcasts, git repos, workouts, chess).
Verified on device rather than by inspection — 369 relays attributed through
client.activeRequests() after a cold start, with no untagged relay-bound filter
left (`0` by grep). Observed distribution across relays:
FOLLOW_LISTS 921 · HOME_FEED 895 · PROFILE_METADATA 881 · NOTIFICATIONS 690
CHATS 82 · SCREEN_CONTENT 81 · WALLET 38 · DIRECT_MESSAGES 17 · RELAY_LISTS 8
which reads correctly: the outbox fan-out puts follows/feed/metadata/notifications
on almost every relay, while DMs and relay-list discovery stay on the few relays
that actually serve them, and the account's own relay carries everything.
That measurement also corrects an assumption behind the planned notification
copy: relays are NOT partitioned by job. A typical relay serves four purposes at
once, so "4 for notifications, 3 for DMs" would be wrong — per-purpose counts
overlap and sum to more than the relay count. The popup wording needs to reflect
that, which is why it is still not written here.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>