Audit of the branch, two findings. `readonly` stops the *user* editing a field, not scripts: the shim writes through the native value setter, so any text that reaches the host mirror is applied to the page and fires an `input` event no native browser would. Cut and Paste were refused at their call sites, but that misses a hardware keyboard (tablets, DeX, Chromebooks) — whose Ctrl+V goes straight to `onTextContextMenuItem`, bypassing the wrapper — and autofill. Configure the mirror as TYPE_NULL for a readonly field instead: `onCheckIsTextEditor()` is then false, so there is no InputConnection to type through at all, while selection and Copy — the half native does offer on a readonly field — keep working. The selection toolbar's item list was rebuilt on every recomposition of the tab layer, which recomposes on every IME inset change, bounds report and console line, for a toolbar only shown during a selection. Remembered on the readonly flag, so it allocates once and keeps a stable identity the overlay can skip on. Adds tools/ime-test/shim-events.mjs, a regression test that drives the shipped shim in headless Chromium and asserts the page→host envelopes. It fails on main (7 cases, including "no ime.wantkb — the keyboard could never come back") and passes here. A JVM unit test cannot cover this: the host parser runs on Android's org.json, which the unit tests stub out, so it would pass without parsing. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01AC3ambee9KFcvHCS6HRqhS
6.2 KiB
IME / text-selection test harness
A single-file web page (index.html) for exercising and profiling the embedded
WebView IME + text-selection relay (see
amethyst/plans/2026-06-25-embed-text-selection-native-parity.md). It has a
plain <input> and a <textarea> plus an on-page green log that records, with
millisecond timestamps:
- focus/blur,
selectionchange,keydown/beforeinput/input, composition events, and the resultingvalue/selection — to catch erase, caret-jump, and focus-transfer regressions; - paint latency (
requestAnimationFrameafter each DOM change) — the metric that exposed the first-letter freeze; - long-task + main-thread-block detectors and a focus/selection heartbeat — to catch anything stalling the WebView main thread or spontaneously moving focus/selection.
The log lines are tagged [ImeDiag] and also go to console.log, so they show
up in adb logcat (the :napplet process owns the WebView console). Nothing
here ships in the app — it's a dev tool, which is why the [ImeDiag] strings
live only under tools/.
Run it
-
Serve this directory over HTTP from your dev machine:
cd tools/ime-test && python3 -m http.server 8765 -
Reach it from the device/emulator:
- Emulator: the page is at
http://10.0.2.2:8765(10.0.2.2is the emulator's alias for the host loopback). - Physical device (USB):
adb reverse tcp:8765 tcp:8765, then the page is athttp://localhost:8765.
- Emulator: the page is at
-
Open that URL as an embedded tab (this is the path that uses the relay — not a full-screen activity):
- Open the in-app browser (
BrowserScreen) and type the URL into its address bar. The embedded browser handleshttp/https, so it loads into the:nappletSurfaceControlViewHost surface.
To compare against native behavior, open the same URL in a full-screen activity (where the WebView renders in-window with the native keyboard) — that is also how you reproduce the full-screen round-trip highlight bug (open full-screen,
back, then selection highlight is dead across all embeds). - Open the in-app browser (
Reading the log
INPUT … val=… sel=…right after a keystroke with the right value = no erase.PAINT-LATENCY Nmsspiking to ~1000ms = the first-letter freeze (should stay low now that the surface no longer resizes on IME show).MAINTHREAD BLOCKED/LONGTASK= something is stalling the WebView thread.HEARTBEATlines changing while idle = spontaneous focus/selection drift.
shim-events.mjs — automated regression test for the IME protocol
index.html and perf.html are manual probes; this one is a real test. It loads
the shipped shim (commons/.../napplet/shim.js) into headless Chromium with the
embedded-surface flags set, drives genuine focus/tap/blur gestures, and asserts
the ime.* envelopes it emits — the doorbell fires on a tap in an
already-focused field, the doorbell stays payload-free, a host ime.resync is
answered with the field state and no geometry, readonly survives the round
trip, and a tap inside a contenteditable counts.
cd tools/ime-test
npm i playwright-core # once; the browser itself is already on the box
node shim-events.mjs # exits 0 on success, 1 with a per-case report
node shim-events.mjs /path/to/other/shim.js # diff a candidate against it
Set CHROMIUM_PATH if your Chromium lives somewhere other than
/opt/pw-browsers/chromium-1194/chrome-linux/chrome.
Why this and not a JVM unit test. The host-side parser
(parseImeEvent) runs on Android's org.json, which the unit tests stub out
(unitTests.isReturnDefaultValues = true in amethyst/build.gradle.kts, and
there is no Robolectric); a Kotlin test would "pass" without parsing anything.
The half worth protecting is the page↔host contract, and that only exists in a
browser.
perf.html — why does the embed feel slower than the full-screen browser?
index.html profiles the IME relay. perf.html answers a different question:
the embedded tab and the full-screen browser are the same WebView in the same
:napplet process with byte-identical WebSettings, so when a site's JS feels
slower in the embed, the cause is host-induced — and this page measures which
host effect it is.
Serve the directory (above) and open the same URL in both hosts, then compare the summary line at the bottom of the page:
-
vis=hidden— decisive. Chromium considers the embedded page hidden, so it clamps timers to ~1Hz and suspendsrequestAnimationFrame. Everything the site schedules lands late; it reads as "the JS got slow". Confirmed bytimer50(a 50ms interval firing at 500-1000ms) andraf(0 fps). -
vis=visiblebutcpuis 2-4× the full-screen number — the process is running on the little cores. The site's JS runs in the WebView renderer process, whose scheduling class is inherited from its host::nappletistop-appwhen it fronts the full-screen activity, but only a bound service (BIND_AUTO_CREATE, noBIND_IMPORTANT) when it serves the embed. Cross-check off-device with:adb shell dumpsys activity processes | grep -E 'napplet|sandboxed' adb shell "cat /proc/$(adb shell pidof com.vitorpamplona.amethyst:napplet)/cgroup"Expect
/top-appwith the full-screen browser open and/foreground(or lower) with an embed tab open. -
cpumatches butinputDeliveryis much higher — the gap is input routing into the embedded window, not compute.inputDeliveryis the time between the platform stamping the touch and JS receiving it. -
layoutmuch higher in the embed — layout/paint is the bottleneck (check logcat for WebView software-rendering warnings; a non-hardware-acceleratedSurfaceControlViewHostwindow would put Chromium on the software path). -
focus=falsein the embed is expected and is not itself a throttle: the host window owns the keyboard, which is the whole reasonRemoteImeViewexists.
longtasks counts main-thread blocks over 50ms while the page was measuring —
high counts in the embed with a matching cpu number point at something else in
the process competing (e.g. parked warm tabs that are never paused).