diff --git a/amethyst/src/main/java/com/vitorpamplona/amethyst/ui/screen/loggedIn/notifications/dal/NotificationFeedFilter.kt b/amethyst/src/main/java/com/vitorpamplona/amethyst/ui/screen/loggedIn/notifications/dal/NotificationFeedFilter.kt
index 124e578ad0..8f4cdc9eb2 100644
--- a/amethyst/src/main/java/com/vitorpamplona/amethyst/ui/screen/loggedIn/notifications/dal/NotificationFeedFilter.kt
+++ b/amethyst/src/main/java/com/vitorpamplona/amethyst/ui/screen/loggedIn/notifications/dal/NotificationFeedFilter.kt
@@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ import com.vitorpamplona.quartz.nipA0VoiceMessages.VoiceEvent
 import com.vitorpamplona.quartz.nipA0VoiceMessages.VoiceReplyEvent
 import com.vitorpamplona.quartz.nipA4PublicMessages.PublicMessageEvent
 import com.vitorpamplona.quartz.nipBCOnchainZaps.zap.OnchainZapEvent
+import com.vitorpamplona.quartz.nipC7Chats.ChatEvent
 import com.vitorpamplona.quartz.nipF4Podcasts.episode.PodcastEpisodeEvent
 import com.vitorpamplona.quartz.nipF4Podcasts.metadata.PodcastMetadataEvent
 import kotlinx.coroutines.flow.MutableStateFlow
@@ -136,6 +137,12 @@ class NotificationFeedFilter(
             setOf(
                 BadgeAwardEvent.KIND,
                 ChannelMessageEvent.KIND,
+                // NIP-29 group chat (kind 9). A reply to my group message is a
+                // kind-9 that p-tags me (see ChannelNewMessageViewModel), fetched
+                // at startup by filterGroupNotificationsToPubkey. Without kind 9
+                // here the acceptableEvent kind gate drops it before the p-tag
+                // check, so those replies never render on the Notifications tab.
+                ChatEvent.KIND,
                 ChatMessageEvent.KIND,
                 ChatMessageEncryptedFileHeaderEvent.KIND,
                 CommentEvent.KIND,
diff --git a/amethyst/src/test/java/com/vitorpamplona/amethyst/ui/screen/loggedIn/notifications/dal/NotificationKindsContractTest.kt b/amethyst/src/test/java/com/vitorpamplona/amethyst/ui/screen/loggedIn/notifications/dal/NotificationKindsContractTest.kt
index 0e49022cf9..886bf711b9 100644
--- a/amethyst/src/test/java/com/vitorpamplona/amethyst/ui/screen/loggedIn/notifications/dal/NotificationKindsContractTest.kt
+++ b/amethyst/src/test/java/com/vitorpamplona/amethyst/ui/screen/loggedIn/notifications/dal/NotificationKindsContractTest.kt
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ package com.vitorpamplona.amethyst.ui.screen.loggedIn.notifications.dal
 import com.vitorpamplona.amethyst.commons.moderation.notifications.NotificationKinds
 import com.vitorpamplona.quartz.nip59Giftwrap.wraps.EphemeralGiftWrapEvent
 import com.vitorpamplona.quartz.nip59Giftwrap.wraps.GiftWrapEvent
+import com.vitorpamplona.quartz.nipC7Chats.ChatEvent
 import org.junit.Assert.assertTrue
 import org.junit.Test
 
@@ -73,4 +74,23 @@ class NotificationKindsContractTest {
             unaccounted.isEmpty(),
         )
     }
+
+    /**
+     * A reply to my message inside a NIP-29 relay group is a kind-9 [ChatEvent]
+     * that p-tags me. It is fetched at startup by `filterGroupNotificationsToPubkey`
+     * (scoped `#p`=me + `#h`=my groups on the group's host relay), but the
+     * `acceptableEvent` gate first checks `kind in NOTIFICATION_KINDS`, so without
+     * kind 9 in the set the reply is dropped before the p-tag check and never
+     * surfaces on the Notifications tab. Pin its presence so it can't silently
+     * regress.
+     */
+    @Test
+    fun `nip-29 group chat replies render on the Android notifications tab`() {
+        assertTrue(
+            "ChatEvent.KIND (9) is missing from NOTIFICATION_KINDS. NIP-29 group " +
+                "replies that p-tag the user would be dropped by the acceptableEvent " +
+                "kind gate before the p-tag check and never notify.",
+            ChatEvent.KIND in NotificationFeedFilter.NOTIFICATION_KINDS,
+        )
+    }
 }